Peer Review Policy

The Journal applies a double-blind peer review process consistent with COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.

Process

1. Initial Editorial Assessment – Manuscripts are screened for suitability, originality, and ethical compliance.
2. Reviewer Assignment – At least two qualified independent experts review the manuscript.
3. Double-Blind Review – Identities of authors and reviewers are concealed.
4. Evaluation Criteria – Reviewers assess originality, methodology, clarity, contribution to knowledge, validity, and citation ethics.
5. Review Timeline – Reviewers typically provide comments within 2–4 weeks.
6. Editorial Decision – Decisions include: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, Resubmit, or Reject.

All peer-review activities adhere to COPE Core Practices.